BarryKarraz

It should, but what if a experience person is getting the encryption method and compiling method of the compiler? Wouldn't that chance be very rare, if the feature was set in a way none else can crack just like how MTA's system is put together. Well, if it's the case it's a šhitty design, seriously. This system is not more secure than compilation anyway. Hypothetically: One could simply access the MTA memory after the decryption or before execution to get the bytecodes. Or maybe someone could call the decryption functions from net.so directly . Or someone could maybe try to use Raknet::DataBlockEncryptor and the MTA keys (this could partially be used to encrypt a script too). It's just another layer of difficulty (which is great). But the implantation could be better. This and this alone is enough reason for me to agree unconditionally. I totally agree, even if the new system makes it more difficult to "steal" a script. Anyway, If you do not want your scripts stolen, code your clients-side scripts to work as much as possible with your server-side scripts (= when possible make the logic server-side). Most of the time, people will steal your scripts and not use them since they would actually need to write some code. And if someone steal something simple like a "login panel", it should not bother you. 99.98% chances their server will still sucks with it.

Thanks for your answer. However, I already know that. Why is there no software or script available that does not make use of the luac.multitheftauto.com service? The only thing luac.multitheftauto.com seems to do when compiling a script without encryption is to add some encrypted junk at the end (maybe generated by the Raknet::DataBlockEncryptor). Is this really necessary?

Hi, I want to know the reasons behind this messages: DIAGNOSTIC: Barry #1003 CLIENT SCRIPT ERROR: dev\test_cl.lua is invalid and will not work in future versions. Please re-compile at [url=https://luac.multitheftauto.com/]https://luac.multitheftauto.com/[/url] Why am I "forced" to use this system and what's the logical reason behind this? I'm quite reluctant to the use of this website. In upcoming versions, why can't we download an application to compile the scripts (or maybe even "encrypt") without having to make a call to the webserver? Thanks for your answers. (I already noticed that there has been some changes in the MTA source code to enable script encryption.)