Jump to content

Glo

Members
  • Content Count

    15
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Glo

  • Rank
    Square
  1. Ok, I want to ask everybody who voted "yes" to cease all actions and just await what presents the MTA team has got for us in the next version (the faster serverbrowser, for instance). The threat alert will be at normal level soon.
  2. I am not accusing you of anything, i am just sharing my opinion here, and you just seem to be very upset that i do so, sir you need to keep your anger a little to yourself. And i am not discriminating anything, i am just giving my opinion and advice, i never said to take anything as seriously as you do. If what you're going to write shouldn't be labeled as serious you better not write at all. You can do non-serious things at very many other places. And you still haven't given me the answer on my question. Can you do that now or do you still have to think of a big story to get around the re
  3. Why is randomization of the serverlist not the answer? And why is discrimination the answer, according to you? I advice the MTA team to stop discriminate people based on marks. Stop trying to wire the opposition's mouth! This poll isn't getting closed just because you see the opposition gets most votes. You're accusing me of things without giving facts. Tell me what is "fine" about the serverlist discriminating new servers? Absolutely nobody would agree with discrimination UNLESS you benefit from it yourself. I bet that's the case with all of the protestors out here. If not, tell me why di
  4. Then why do you agree with mr. Telepath that popular servers (according to mr. Telepath and you popular servers are GOOD servers) will suffer from the equal and non-discriminating serverlist? And again: it doesn't make sense at all. It's NOT about BORING/GOOD/XXX servers, its about equal chances for ALL servers . Stop talking about nothing and focus on the real problem.
  5. If you reply here because of the person who started the topic you already are at the wrong address. People voting and replying here are doing that because they feel discriminated and want to solve this problem (except varez). Stop telling people to XXX if XXX. For the last time: more active servers are NOT on top. The oldest servers are on top. That's a huge difference. So you really think it's not a problem that new servers are discriminated? I see why you have chosen for option 2. You don't even have the right so speak as you're not a community member nor server owner. Because I'm alwa
  6. Glo

    Serverlist

    Mr. Ransom, why shouldn't the serverlist be randomized? It doesn't matter if you sort the list on ping, players or whatever: the oldest servers are always first shown. That is the problem, not any filters, not anything else. Do you understand that? So why shouldn't we take out that inequality as well and randomize the list every X minutes? I expect a great reply from the only person with some good theories with supported arguments (however it's sad your theories don't have anything to do with the problem I'm pointing at). I would like to redirect you to viewtopic.php?f=102&t=29594 for an
  7. I never said we should “reverse” the list. Why did you leave out ? It is a strong argument against your theory as well as that your theory isn’t factual. (false argument count: 1) What you said before: You are clearly saying that I don’t have any idea about the current system. I do, its not random. That’s a fact. And it seems you agree with that, so why did you tell me that “you really don’t get the idea of initial sorting that game-monitor.com is doing” – its totally not relevant to the problem. (false argument count: 2) Somebody from the MTA team. You seem to not trust my words at
  8. Stop telling me what to do. You try to push your opinion through all of this forum, not everybody takes that (at least I don't). Grow up. As i said in this topic - less than month is needed to make your good server to be on the top. That's not a factual argument. Its what you have experienced, it doesn't have to be the same for everyone. And it changes nothing of the fact that the list is unfair and discriminating. This is just a lie. Servers are moving through the list, you really don't get the idea of initial sorting that game-monitor.com is doing. Maybe go to their site and find s
  9. Problem 1 I noticed the server list is currently ordered in the following way: - servers that went online first (= oldest servers) are at the top of the list - servers that went online later (= newer servers) are somewhere between the top and bottom of the list - servers that just went online (= newest servers) are at the bottom of the list In short: the oldest servers are always at the top, and the newest always at the bottom. The current list is unfair. How come? The server list is based on this theory, and it's not randomly shuffled so it will stay exactly like this. Example? Your
  10. Glo

    Serverlist

    Nope, I wasn't creating any polls through ppl, I just have seen many of my friends doing this on various multiplayer games. It's logical - who wants to play on empty server or with mega lag? The "natural reaction" is to sort by players count or ping Discrimination is everywhere. MTA is not working on Mac's for example. For USA this could be even more than 1% - from what I can read over the internet. Also I wouldn't use the word "discrimination" to describe default server sorting on multiplayer game. I think many people use the search filter to e.g. search for "dm" or "race". Servers at
  11. Glo

    Serverlist

    You can still see the problem here... The servers at top will have the most players (usually), and if other players sort by player count... And do you have any hard facts of the % of people sorting it on their own? Even if it would be 99%, thats still no excuse to discriminate the other 1%. Discrimination seems to continue..
  12. Glo

    Serverlist

    The problem I noticed the server list is currently ordered in the following way: - servers that went online first (= oldest servers) are at the top of the list - servers that went online later (= newer servers) are somewhere between the top and bottom of the list - servers that just went online (= newest servers) are at the bottom of the list In short: the oldest servers are always at the top, and the newest always at the bottom. How come? The server list is based on this theory, and it's not randomly shuffled so it will stay exactly like this. Example? Your friend started a server 2
  13. For example, it doesn't work under a certain delay amount (sometimes 100ms, another time 1000ms - varies), and doesn't work without a timer at all.
  14. Needs to be done like this to set the cam behind player: setCameraTarget(player) setTimer(setCameraTarget, 1000, 1, player) and then still doesn't work all times. That's why a dedicated function would be better
  15. setCameraBehindPlayer(player) - ability to set camera directly behind a player. Can be done using setCameraTarget at the moment, but unfortunately that method does not always work and requires a timer.
×
×
  • Create New...